Download article in Microsoft Word
(.doc) format (zipped, 4KB)
Steering Clear of Capitated managed care places physicians in the conflicted role of serving two masters, the patient or the HMO/managed care organization. How can a physician act in the best interests of the patient and still meet fiscal responsibilities imposed by an HMO/managed care organization? The answer is: a physician must advocate on behalf of the patient's best interests. The physician should order what is medically necessary for the patient, regardless of cost constraints. The following trial summary illustrates how advocacy can avoid potential liability for "bad faith" conduct.
In January 1999, a San Bernardino County jury awarded $120.5 million in damages against Aetna-U.S.Healthcare, one of the nation's largest HMOs.1 The widow of a stomach cancer patient sued the HMO for "bad faith" disapproval of cancer therapy that promised to prolong her husband's survival. The verdict included $116 million in punitive damages against the HMO for placing its own financial interests above the needs of the individual patient. (Aetna has appealed.) Significantly, treating physicians were not held liable.
The verdict is a record HMO bad faith award, eclipsing the $89 million verdict in Fox v. HealthNet, decided in December 1993 in nearby Riverside County. Similar to the Fox case, Goodrich was a patient with advanced cancer, referred for high-dose chemotherapy and expensive bone-marrow transplant therapy. The recommended treatment, including surgery, could not cure the underlying cancer, but might prolong the patient's survival. As in Fox, the HMO took the position that the recommended treatment was not a covered benefit, and in any event, that the patient was not an appropriate candidate. In both cases, the patient ultimately received the recommended treatment, but died shortly thereafter. Both patients were governmental employees or spouses, exempt from the ERISA barrier to state court lawsuits against HMOs.
David Goodrich, a 41-year old prosecutor in charge of the District Attorney's gang prosecution unit, was diagnosed in June 1992 with leiomyosarcoma, a rare stomach cancer. His health plan was provided through his employer, San Bernardino County. His in-plan surgical oncologist referred David to the City of Hope for specialized treatment of his rare tumor. The health plan generally provided for such out-of-plan care, if ordered by an in-plan physician. Nevertheless, the treatment request was referred to Aetna's medical director, pursuant to a "terminal illness policy" unknown to the patient or his doctors. In November 1992, Aetna denied the request, indicating that "experimental treatment' was not a covered benefit.
In September 1993, David Goodrich underwent liver cryosurgery and chemotherapy, another segment of his recommended treatment. After the fact, Aetna denied financial responsibility for the cryosurgery, citing lack of prior approval for out-of-plan services. Ultimately, Aetna agreed to pay for the cryosurgery, but not for the follow-up chemotherapy. In January 1995, David Goodrich underwent debulking surgery, followed by more chemotherapy. While the patient recovered in intensive care, Aetna arranged to hand-deliver a denial letter to his wife at the hospital. At that time, David's wife owed $750,000 in unpaid medical and hospital bills. David Goodrich died on March 15, 1995, never having left the hospital after the last surgery.
Following his death, David Goodrich's primary care physician formally requested that Aetna reconsider its denials. In November 1995, Aetna reconfirmed its denials, and the bad faith lawsuit followed. At trial, David's treating surgical oncologist testified that, had cryosurgery occurred in February 1993, as opposed to September 1993, David's survival would have been extended for 15-20 months. Both the surgical oncologist and Goodrich's primary care physicians appeared to act solely upon their medical judgments regarding what care was medically necessary and appropriate.
This huge verdict against an HMO sends two important messages: (1) juries do not like HMOs or physicians who appear to place their own financial interests above the health of their patients, and (2) physicians may avoid "bad faith" liability by advocating appropriate care for their patients. This means: (a) educating patients about the consequences of delayed tests or treatments and identifying out-of-plan options, (b) making out-of-plan referrals where circumstances dictate, and (c) defending your recommendations in the face of cost-containment pressures.
1 Goodrich v. Aetna-U.S.Healthcare, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. RCV020499.
|
I promise to answer your message -- click here to send me a personal message
|
SUBSCRIBE: The Wednesday Letter is a free electronic monthly newsletter written and published by Karl Loren. You can view more than 50 back issues of this publication by clicking here. The Wednesday Letter subscription list is maintained on a secure server, no name is ever given or sold to anyone, and it is never used except for this Newsletter. It is automatically published on the Tuesday night just before the first Wednesday of every month. You can subscribe to this free monthly electronic letter by entering your eMail address and name below. You will then automatically receive a request for confirmation, sent to whatever address you have entered. If you do NOT receive this confirmation request, then you will not be subscribed. There may have been an error with your address and you should resubmit. The letter is never sent twice to the same address -- so you do not have to worry about a duplicate subscription. When you receive this confirmation request you must reply to it, or your subscription will not become active. No one can subscribe your name, and address, without you being notified, and if you get an unwanted notice of subscription you only need to DO NOTHING and the subscription will NOT be active.
REMOVAL: You can remove yourself from the subscription list in several different ways. Click here to read about this entire newsletter system. Every edition of The Wednesday Letter is delivered to your address with YOUR name and address in view on the letter, with a link that allows you to remove THAT name from the subscription list. If you try to send this removal message from an address different from the one you used to send in your original confirmation, then you will get a warning notice first, sent to the subscription address, asking you to confirm that you want to be removed from the list -- by replying to THAT request for confirmation, you will then be automatically removed. Thus, no one else can unsubscribe you, from some other computer, without your knowledge. But, if you send in the unsubscribe notice from the same machine used to receive the Letter, then the removal from the subscription list is automatic.
Personal Message: When you send a personal message to Karl Loren, you will receive a personal reply as per his instructions. Karl pledges that every personal message will get a personal answer. When you provide your mail address, we will send you free information including our free catalog and a cassette tape lecture by Karl Loren about heart disease, no charge, by mail, even if outside the US. You can select particular information you would like to receive, along with the free cassette tape and catalog.
You can reach Vibrant Life in many ways, including by mail to Vibrant Life, 2808 N. Naomi St., Burbank, CA 91504. Within the US and Canada, use the toll free number: (800) 523-4521, the local number: (818) 558-1799, the FAX: (818) 558-7299, eMail to kimberly@oralchelation.com or any one of the hundreds of message forms throughout the 50 web sites. Vibrant Life normally ships the same day we get an order. There are message forms on each of the 100,000+ pages on this and other sites where you can communicate with Vibrant Life. Check out our companion site, at: http://www.oralchelation.net where Karl's 2000 page book is published. Karl Loren is the author and webmaster for this BOOK, as well as for another web site about ORAL CHELATION. His personal philosophical articles are at PHILOSOPHY.
Copyright © April 25, 2008 2:38 AM by Karl Loren on behalf of Vibrant Life, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission is granted for non-commercial downloading, copying, distribution or redistribution on two conditions: One, that some form of copyright notice is included in every copy distributed or copied, showing the copyright belonging to Vibrant Life, Burbank, CA, at www.oralchelation.com . The second condition is that the material is not to be used for any purpose contrary to the purposes and objectives of this site. This permission does not extend to materials on this site which are copyrighted by others.
